It is so funny, but not funny in a happy way. It is funny in a satirical way.
It is funny that many "holy" people are arguing concepts of God that no one will ever know.
But the fact that true holy ones spoke and someone is telling you what they spoke is up for no debate.
Is it true that if a woman shone light on something and no man would agree, it would be a shame?
What is the real shame there? Is it that a woman can see better than a man or that a man can't see it?
Sight is not a shame. Anyone saying "I see" but is not seeing is a shame.
It would not be necessary for me (a woman) to communicate correction if it was being communicated by any man.
There are many errors believed in but there is no man making a correction. THAT IS THE SHAME.
God bless Paul, my brother, and may he rest in the rest of YHVH in peace.
It is funny that many "holy" people are arguing concepts of God that no one will ever know.
But the fact that true holy ones spoke and someone is telling you what they spoke is up for no debate.
Is it true that if a woman shone light on something and no man would agree, it would be a shame?
What is the real shame there? Is it that a woman can see better than a man or that a man can't see it?
Sight is not a shame. Anyone saying "I see" but is not seeing is a shame.
It would not be necessary for me (a woman) to communicate correction if it was being communicated by any man.
There are many errors believed in but there is no man making a correction. THAT IS THE SHAME.
God bless Paul, my brother, and may he rest in the rest of YHVH in peace.
No comments:
Post a Comment