Is it because if anyone were listening I would be teaching?

Paul said it is a shame for a woman to teach the congregation.
If it is the reason why no one is with me, then those leaving the organization really have not left.
Have they?

If you were to adopt a word I say that would replace something else you are leaning on to believe that would be me teaching you.
And I am a woman.  At least that is what I always have been.

What did Paul really mean when he said that?

I have published this before and even though it would be a weapon against the organization of Jehovah's Witnesses and The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, even the worst enemy of the society reject it as a woman's opinion and a lie.

Here we have a woman who is thinking something new.  But all the new things the woman is thinking will die with her death.  All the evidence points to it.

Did Paul mean any teaching from any woman is evil and prohibited?

I don't think so.

Did he mean that if lightening comes from a woman it is a shame it did not come from a man?

If man is the head of every woman (I believe it) then if a woman is congnizant of words that are true of Christ. but no man would agree, that is a SHAME.