So if Mr. Rogers was not a Jehovah's Witness
and the end was imminent there was something wrong with
the understanding of The Faithful and Discrete Slave.
OR Mr. Rogers has to die.
Or Mr. Rogers was leading a double life.
I think a famous poet said "What's in a name?"
To open up the imagination that Mr. Rogers was
one who is described at Revelation 21:8 is SLANDEROUS.
To apply it to doctrine that is attached to the HOUSE OF GOD
is blasphemous.
and the end was imminent there was something wrong with
the understanding of The Faithful and Discrete Slave.
OR Mr. Rogers has to die.
Or Mr. Rogers was leading a double life.
I think a famous poet said "What's in a name?"
To open up the imagination that Mr. Rogers was
one who is described at Revelation 21:8 is SLANDEROUS.
To apply it to doctrine that is attached to the HOUSE OF GOD
is blasphemous.
No comments:
Post a Comment