Reasons why

I do not know why it is not important to correct wrongs.  It must be important.  If it is so important for real to get things right, then I must be wrong.

Though I have thought of reasons why if they are wrong they will stay wrong.

If anyone does admit something in the Bible is wrong it is hard for me to believe that someone does not believe it should be corrected.  Even unbelievers in it, I think, would agree.  So what is wrong with fixing it?  It is too big of a work to do and just thinking about it is too much.

Another reason why is the wisdom about sleeping dogs.  Do not wake the dog!  It might SNAP.

If I am unable to move one soul moving two would seem impossible.  So that's another reason why it will not be fixed.  It isn't possible.

It isn't really, but let's go with it is.  Hell, why not?

Another reason is that if you might love to cause suffering I am and so let it be.

If you love to cause laughter I am so let it be.

It's too scary is another reason.

The worst reason, of course, is how do I know it is wrong and know it can be fixed and how.

I know it is wrong.  I know it can be fixed.  And fixing it is easy.  Expensive. True. Lots and lots of work.  True.  But it can be done.

Provocation 1 Cor 13:5

Action or speach that makes someone annoyed or angry especially deliberately.

The faithful and discreet slave who professes to be the only one in the world telling the truth says Paul wrote "love is not provoked".  They adopted Christiandom's understanding of it so now that's the way it is.

Love is not provoked means when love is provoked it does not get angry.  Other Bibles say love is not "easily angered".

The besy way to be love then is to get away from all the people.  It is probably the only way.

Paul really said love does not provoke which means love does not act in a way that deliberately causes unrest in another.

Isaiah 42:2,3

"He will not raise his voice....no crushed reed will he break"

What does no crushed reed will he break mean?

He is love who does not cause another one to be angry.

You know...like....on purpose?

What's the point?

Believing Jesus commanded to go make disciples and believing Jah commanded the meeting together physically, and believing "bad associations" are people, CAUSES behavior in the believer, even causes a certain way of thinking. If Jesus really said be disciples and  be not forsaking the gathering together means to be in agreement together about the way, the truth and the life which is written, and if bad associations to be on guard against are misunderstandings of what it written THEN the people's behavior would be something DIFFERENT and Truth would grow.

I am sorry a world against me

Has not changed my mind.  I am still insisting the writer of 1 Corinthians 13:5 wrote love is not provocation.  They say it means love is not easily angered.  Or like the Jehovah's Witnesses say "easily provoked".  Acts 17:16 has Paul provoked at seeing some statues which imo means easily angered.  So they have some penises.  And some ugly art other than that.  I call getting angry at stone "easily angered".  Does Paul have love? Not according to you!   And Jehovah will cause a judgement of destruction on all the people.  For what?  For not being nice to his slave.  How is that not easily provoked?

So I did a llittle more searching and found that the idea of anger in a man is crossed referenced at James 1:19.  I might call it a proof for your interpretation because it does warn about getting angry but a different word is there which word is ὀργήν· "Slow to anger".  The word you translate slow to anger or not provoked is παροξύνω.  Also James 1:19 is advice to people.  1 Corinthians 13:5 is not about people it is about LOVE which is God.  "God is love". 1 John 4:8


The definitions "provoke":
pro·voke  (prə-vōk′)
tr.v. pro·voked, pro·vok·ing, pro·vokes
1. To incite to anger or resentment.
2. To stir to action or feeling.
3. To give rise to; evoke: provoke laughter.
4. To bring about deliberately; induce: provoke a fight.

Anger is an impulse.  But causeing someone else anger in them is a strategy. The Bibles have love being able to control an impulse.   But I say love does not plan bad things against another.  When you judge a person how does that judged person feel?  He feels stirred up within which is what the scripture means.


An unrelated thought about παροξύνω.  I believe it is the reason YHVH does not speak much.  There I go again!  God will she ever stop?  I have heard about death.  Death means stop.  LOL

I do not think I am able to be sorryer (Which probably isn't a word as there is nothing about spelling it)

A little bird told me

They think I am not worth telling it is quibbling over semantics and not worth their trouble.

I am talking about what Jesus commanded "I am going therefore disciple the nations, baptizing and teaching teaching them all I have commanded"

Which they say means You go make disciples.

You think maybe it is not a serious difference.  Either way is OK.  But it isn't.

This is what gets my goat.  The exes hate me.  Actually worse than hate me.  They imagine I am nothing.  But if the understanding was changed to disciple the nations instead of make disciples of the nations, the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society would have no reason to do what they do.  They do what they do because Jesus said Go!  Make disciples.  That is what they do.  They do not teach how to be a disciple of Jesus which is something that only The Holy Spirit can do.  They teach people to be disciples of law, but not even the law of Moses.  They teach people their own law.  Why?  To make disciples.  LIKE YOU SAY JESUS COMMANDED TO DO.

I think it is so cute

Alun is shunning me.  A bit ridiculous but certainly goes with the Alice theme.

Why say paradise is boring?

I do not know if paradise is boring or not boring.  I know for sure though that paradise like the Jehovah's Witnesses teach it would be.  You know some days I'd go snorkeling.  I might even go with a friend.  That day would not be boring.

I like to think.  It is my favorite hobby.  They teach a paradise where thinking is not necessary.  Thinking there will be done by the slave that will have put on the role of king and priest by then.   I realize they teach to get there there must be one thought.  How am I able to assume that once I am there the one thought will be done away with?  I have to assume there will still be orders to think the same way. I don't want to do that.